Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ® ±¸¼º¿ä¼ÒÀÇ ÆÄÀý¸é¿¡ °üÇÑ ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀû ¿¬±¸ : Part II - ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö³ª»ç

Fracture Analysis of Implant Components Using Scanning Electron Microscope. Part I - Implant Retaining Screw

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2010³â 26±Ç 4È£ p.373 ~ 388
ÀÓ±¤±æ, ±è´ë°ï, Á¶¸®¶ó, ¹ÚÂùÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓ±¤±æ ( Lim Kwang-Gil ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±è´ë°ï ( Kim Dae-Gon ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶¸®¶ó ( Cho Lee-Ra ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÂùÁø ( Park Chan-Jin ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ½ÇÆд ÆÄÀý·Î ÀÎÇØ ´Ù¼ö ¹ß»ýÇÏ°Ô µÇÁö¸¸ ÆÄÀý ¹ß»ý½Ã ±× ¿øÀÎÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¾î·Æ´Ù. º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ½ÇÆи¦ ¿¹¹æÇÏ°í ¿¹Èĸ¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϱâ À§ÇØ º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ¿øÀÎÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ Áß¿äÇϸç, ¿øÀÎÀ» ¹àÈ÷±â À§ÇØ ÆÄÀý¸é ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ÆÄÀý¸é ºÐ¼®Àº ÆÄÀý¸é »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÁÖÀ§ ȯ°æ(ÀÀ·Â »óȲ)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÐ¼®ÀÌ µ¿¹ÝµÇ¸ç, À̸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±Õ¿­ ÁøÇà, ÆÄÀý ¾ç»ó, ÆÄÀý ¿øÀÎ µîÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ±â´É ½Ã ÆÄÀýµÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö³ª»çÀÇ ÆÄÀý¸é ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ÆÄÀý ±âÀü ¹× ÆÄÀý ¿øÀÎ(ÇÏÁß ¾ç»ó)À» ¹àÈ÷´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÆÄÀýµÈ ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö³ª»ç´Â 3³â°£ °­¸ª-¿øÁÖ ´ëÇб³¿¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö³ª»çÀÇ ÆÄÀýÀ» ÁÖ¼Ò·Î ³»¿øÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼öÁýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ÕÀú ÀÓ»ó ¹× ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ½ÃÆí ¼¼Ã´ °úÁ¤À» °ÅÃÄ ÁÖ»ç ÀüÀÚ Çö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÆÄÀý¸é ºÐ¼®À» ½Ã ÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÆÄÀý¸é ºÐ¼® ½Ã ÇÇ·Î ÁÙ¹«´Ì, Åé´Ï¹ÙÄû ¸ð¾ç, º®°³ ÆÄÀý, µõÇà ÆÄÀý µîÀÇ ÆÄÀý ÁöÇ¥¸¦ ÅëÇØ Á¦ÀÛ ±Ý¼Ó, ÆÄÀý ½Ã ÇÏÁß»óÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ °¢±â ´Ù¸¥ ÆÄÀý ¾ç»óÀ» °üÂûÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

Fracture causes serious problems in many instance of prosthetic failures. But it is hard to find the definite causes when fractures occur. Fractography encompasses the examination of fracture surfaces that contain features resulting from the interaction of the advancing crack with the microstructure of the material and the stress fields. All fractured specimens(implant retaining screw) retrieved from Gangneung-Wonju national university dental hospital for 3 years(from 2007 to 2009). After pretreatment of samples, the scanning electon microscope were used for surface examination and fracture analysis. In case of most of the fractured specimens, fracture took place by fatigue fracture and fractured surface represents fatigue striation. Fatigue striation indicate the progression of the crack front under cyclic loading, are characteristic of stage 2 crack growth. The site of crack initiation and stage 1 crack growth were not easily identified in any of the failure, presumably because of the complex microstructural features of the polycrystalline sample. In case of fractured by overload, dimpled or cleavage surface were observed. Using the interpretation of characteristic markings(ratchet mark, fatigue striation, dimple, cleavage et al) in fracture surfaces, failure events containing the crack origin, crack propagation, material deficiency could be understand. Using the interpretation of characteristic markings in fracture surfaces, cause and mechanism of fractures could be analyzed.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö³ª»ç;ÆÄÀý;ÆÄÀý¸éºÐ¼®
Fracture analysis;implant retaining screw;scanning electron microscope

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI